+1 non-binding

Apologies, my concerns were clarified.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 9:55 AM Lorenzo Affetti <
[email protected]> wrote:

> -1 non-binding
>
> I raised my concerns on the discussion thread.
> I think 2 directions worth exploring/documenting (paginated requests with
> snapshot ID, and true streaming RPC), should be evaluated extensively
> before opting for this design.
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 7:16 AM Nicholas Jiang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> +1.
>>
>> Warm Regards,
>> Nicholas Jiang
>>
>> On 2026/03/24 18:04:54 Giannis Polyzos wrote:
>> > Hi devs,
>> > I'd like to start a vote on FIP-17 Support Full KV Scan for Primary Key
>> > Tables [1].
>> >
>> > You can find the discussion on it in [2].
>> > This vote will last for at least 72 hours, unless there are objections
>> or
>> > insufficient votes.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Giannis
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUSS/FIP-17+Support+Full+KV+Scan+for+Primary+Key+Tables
>> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/nx8tq85o7rxsp7m0oy7s30cmn1mrkg4j
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Lorenzo Affetti
> Senior Software Engineer @ Flink Team
> Ververica <http://www.ververica.com>
>


-- 
Lorenzo Affetti
Senior Software Engineer @ Flink Team
Ververica <http://www.ververica.com>

Reply via email to