On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 03:18:57PM +0100, Loftus, Ciara wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH 13/13] net/ice: enable context desc offloads for vector Tx > > > > Use the context descriptor Tx vector paths from intel/common in ice > > driver to enable more offloads on the vector path for ice driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <[email protected]> > > --- > > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_26_11.rst | 6 ++++ > > drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.h | 3 ++ > > drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++--- > > drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx.h | 11 ++++++++ > > drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx512.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++ > > 6 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > <snip> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx.h > > b/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx.h > > index 999b6b30d6..bee8a464f5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx.h > > +++ b/drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx.h > > @@ -135,6 +135,12 @@ > > RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM | \ > > RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM | \ > > RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SCTP_CKSUM) > > +/* vector ctx offload path: QinQ outer tag + outer/tunnel checksum via ctx > > desc */ > > +#define ICE_TX_VECTOR_CTX_OFFLOAD_OFFLOADS ( \ > > + ICE_TX_VECTOR_OFFLOAD_OFFLOADS | \ > > + RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM | \ > > + RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_UDP_CKSUM | \ > > + RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_QINQ_INSERT) > > Now that the paths and thus offloads are shared, is it worth creating > common OFFLOADS masks? I assume > IAVF_TX_VECTOR_CTX_OFFLOAD_OFFLOADS is an exact match for > ICE_TX_VECTOR_CTX_OFFLOAD_OFFLOADS > Yes, it is probably worth doing. Not sure if it's best in this patchset or not. Let me investigate.
/Bruce
