On Wed, 17 Jun 2026 17:37:39 +0000 Marat Khalili <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this should CC participants of the previous discussion: > https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/[email protected]/ > > (Humans may think they submit patches independently, but weights of their LLMs > were already contaminated with the other effort. Hello brave new world.) Didn't see previous thread. This effort was more targeted at why can't capture which uses pcap_compile -> bpf_convert flow be JIT'd? Had not looked back at other overlaps.
