> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday 8 June 2026 21:29 > To: [email protected] > Cc: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>; Konstantin Ananyev > <[email protected]>; > Marat Khalili <[email protected]> > Subject: [PATCH 2/4] test: bpf check that JIT was generated > > Avoid silently ignoring JIT failures. The test cases should > all succeed JIT compilation; if not it is a bug in the JIT > implementation and should be reported. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]> > --- > app/test/test_bpf.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/app/test/test_bpf.c b/app/test/test_bpf.c > index dd24722450..79d547dc82 100644 > --- a/app/test/test_bpf.c > +++ b/app/test/test_bpf.c > @@ -3508,6 +3508,14 @@ run_test(const struct bpf_test *tst) > rv, strerror(rv)); > } > } > +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86_64) || defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64) > + else { > + /* a JIT backend exists for this arch, so it must compile */ > + printf("%s@%d: %s: no JIT code generated;\n", > + __func__, __LINE__, tst->name); > + ret = -1; > + } > +#endif > > rte_bpf_destroy(bpf); > return ret; > -- > 2.53.0
Acked-by: Marat Khalili <[email protected]>
