Hi Bruce,

Sorry for the late reply.

The purpose of this patch is to prevent issues introduced after values are 
initialized to zero, such as the failure to create a second rule on 82599.

I understand and agree with your concern. I didn't take models other than E610 
and 82599 into account, so this patch will be dropped.

Thanks for pointing this out.

Best regards,
Yuan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2025 8:31 PM
> To: Wang, YuanX <yuanx.w...@intel.com>
> Cc: Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>; Medvedkin, Vladimir
> <vladimir.medved...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix port mask default value on E610
> 
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 05:09:07PM +0800, Yuan Wang wrote:
> > Modification of default values should be limited to E610, as 82599
> > handles raw IP well.
> >
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think you could do with clarifying the issue here. The patch title seems to
> imply that there is an issue with the E610, but in fact the code change is 
> for all
> NICs except E610. What is the observed behaviour on an X550 or an
> 82599 NIC vs what is desired? Is setting the default masks to zero not ok?
> 
> Thanks,
> /Bruce
> 
> > Fixes: c81daae2383a (net/ixgbe: fix port mask default value in filter)
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuan Wang <yuanx.w...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c | 6 ++++--
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
> > b/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
> > index 1bf0af330f..71b11f9e70 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
> > @@ -1644,8 +1644,10 @@ ixgbe_parse_fdir_filter_normal(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >     memset(&rule->mask, 0xFF, sizeof(struct ixgbe_hw_fdir_mask));
> >     rule->mask.vlan_tci_mask = 0;
> >     rule->mask.flex_bytes_mask = 0;
> > -   rule->mask.dst_port_mask = 0;
> > -   rule->mask.src_port_mask = 0;
> > +   if (hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_E610) {
> > +           rule->mask.dst_port_mask = 0;
> > +           rule->mask.src_port_mask = 0;
> > +   }
> >
> >     /**
> >      * The first not void item should be
> > --
> > 2.47.1
> >

Reply via email to