I agree. This is a good point.
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> </div><div>Date:12/30/2014 3:53 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: [email protected] </div><div>Cc: </div><div>Subject: Re: website prototype update </div><div> </div>Hi Radu, On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Radu Cotescu <[email protected]> wrote: > ...To summarise, we have three options when it comes to publishing website > updates with Jekyll... A fourth one is to use a java-based website generator instead of Jekyll, so that we can at least use the same toolset for building the website and the devicemap java code. http://jbake.org/ looks to me like a viable option, WDYT? Docs at http://jbake.org/docs/2.3.2/ -Bertrand
