On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:02 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9 January 2014 12:46, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hm, my understanding is that trunk only contains snapshots. > > Yes. > > But what has that to do with the dates in documentation? >
I thought we were talking about dates that are generated from changes.xml. Are you talking about hard-coded dates in site files that generate HTML? Gary > > G > > > > -------- Original message -------- > > From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> > > Date:01/09/2014 07:40 (GMT-05:00) > > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: [LANG] Delaying announcement of 3.2.1 some more > > > > 2014/1/9 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > > > >> Did the date end up getting committed in trunk or the RC tag? For me it > >> only ends up in the tag. > >> > > > > I only committed it t the tag. That's why is has been overwritten by the > > site build from trunk. > > The problem with only committing the date to the tag is, that you have to > > remember to commit it trunk, if the vote succeeds (which I haven't ;-) > > > > Benedikt > > > > > >> > >> Gary > >> > >> -------- Original message -------- > >> From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> > >> Date:01/09/2014 01:24 (GMT-05:00) > >> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > >> Subject: [LANG] Delaying announcement of 3.2.1 some more > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> yesterday I've released 3.2.1. I also updated the site from the tag. > This > >> time I fllowed Garys advice and prepared the tag so that it could be > used > >> to create the site: I set the release date in changes.xml to the date > the > >> RC was created and changed the texts on index.xml. So erverything > should be > >> fine, right? > >> But today I'm looking at the page and it has been recreated frm trunk! > >> Sadly I've forgotten to update changes.xml and index.xml in trunk > >> yesterday. So now the download page points to the 3.2.1 artifacts but > >> index.xml says the latest release is 3.2. > >> > >> The question is: who updated the site? I don't the anything on > >> commits@c.a.o. > >> @Sebb: is this some Contionuum magic? > >> I'll have to rebuild the site tonight when I'm at home. After that I'll > >> send the announcement. > >> > >> Benedikt > >> -- > >> http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > >> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > >> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > >> http://github.com/britter > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > > http://github.com/britter > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
