Did the date end up getting committed in trunk or the RC tag? For me it only ends up in the tag.
Gary -------- Original message -------- From: Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> Date:01/09/2014 01:24 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Subject: [LANG] Delaying announcement of 3.2.1 some more Hi all, yesterday I've released 3.2.1. I also updated the site from the tag. This time I fllowed Garys advice and prepared the tag so that it could be used to create the site: I set the release date in changes.xml to the date the RC was created and changed the texts on index.xml. So erverything should be fine, right? But today I'm looking at the page and it has been recreated frm trunk! Sadly I've forgotten to update changes.xml and index.xml in trunk yesterday. So now the download page points to the 3.2.1 artifacts but index.xml says the latest release is 3.2. The question is: who updated the site? I don't the anything on commits@c.a.o. @Sebb: is this some Contionuum magic? I'll have to rebuild the site tonight when I'm at home. After that I'll send the announcement. Benedikt -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/britter
