-1 I am not comfortable either with lazy consensus here. It is a release and furthermore it is a dependency for all our components as what we release is really source code, so the build process is important.
We clearly failed with the previous vote, but Gary set up another one quickly. Luc ----- "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> a écrit : > +1 Although it is technically a release, I can't imagine why any > external entity would directly use it. Even if they do they would have > to test it no matter what we do. Having a less formal procedure for > this just makes sense to me. > > Ralph > > On Apr 18, 2011, at 2:40 PM, sebb wrote: > > > As suggested by Hen, we should be able to use lazy consensus voting > > for Commons Parent pom releases. > > > > [ ] +1 let's use lazy consensus voting for Commons Parent pom in > future > > [ ] -1 why not? > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
