Re: [VOTE] Stable CForms

[Ralph Goers]

Vadim Gritsenko said:
> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>>
>>> As soon as forms is really called and *treated* as stable: +1
>>
>> As I said previously, the number of CForms users is such that any change
>> will have to be backwards compatible.
>>
>> I removed v2 and v3 as the (unnamed) v1 should be the official API, but
>> this breaks the DreamTeam sample that's using v3
>
> We need official vote to mark CForms stable, so let's start it. Please
> vote to
> mark CForms as stable, to be included in imminent 2.1.9 release:
>
>   [X ] +1, Let's do it!
>   [ ]  0, What is CForms?
>   [ ] -1, It's not stable, because...
>
>