Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
As soon as forms is really called and *treated* as stable: +1
As I said previously, the number of CForms users is such that any
change will have to be backwards compatible.
I removed v2 and v3 as the (unnamed) v1 should be the official API,
but this breaks the DreamTeam sample that's using v3
We need official vote to mark CForms stable, so let's start it. Please
vote to mark CForms as stable, to be included in imminent 2.1.9 release:
[ ] +1, Let's do it!
[ ] 0, What is CForms?
[ ] -1, It's not stable, because...
I vote +1.
PS Of course, sample should be fixed before 2.1.9 is out, but this vote
only about CForms stability.
+1
--
Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67 http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812 fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65
