-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 11:49:32 +0100
From: Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RT] Simplifying component handling
Giacomo Pati wrote:
I'm with Sylvain's and Gianugo's oppinion. I also see users getting
confused with multiple choices of "how to write a component".
I personally don't see a problem *if* we tell them how to do it right.
Perhaps I'm wrong, don't know.
:-) and which one is the right one?
I'd say in this area we need a revolution instead of an evolution.
Ok, I agree that we need a revolution - I guess most of us do - but
honestly,
where is this revolution? When will it take place? And even more
important, we don't have a common understanding of this revolution
and how it might look like. So it's really hard (if not impossible)
right now to do something that helps getting at this point :(
Of course we do not have a common understanding. We have old farts like
me comfortable with the Avalon way :-) that say "I know it well and it
has worked for years, so why should I change", younger ones familiar
with Spring but not so with Avalon. We have a friendly community with no
dictators but probably in this case one would be handy to say "we go the
XYZ way" ;-)
- --
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDulh7LNdJvZjjVZARAgGmAKCX6nDfMhgK8PvhbB+A1gFhtZc3kQCeMWHS
cFOL3zIgxPa8tsEvBCT9VNg=
=Wh1q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
