Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
Guido Casper wrote:
Sorry, I think I was not clear (my fault). I intended the vote to be
about marking (like within javadocs) either:
-internal classes
or (the opposite):
-published classes
The first is what Vadim suggested and most simple to do (there are
just a few internal classes).
The latter opens the door to further classify classes/interfaces.
OK, I get it now. Let's start with marking internal classes then. This
is what is needed most ATM in order to allow the cocoon internals to
more freely evolve.
+1
So I summarize that there is a strong preference to marking internal
classes and let "public" be the default.
I'll remove my crappy doclet task then. I wasn't very happy about it
anyway. I'll continue thinking about better ways to document the various
APIs at different levels.
Maybe they should just be separated into different Java packages.
Guido
