Guido Casper wrote: > > Hm, noone (but me :-) seems to like the idea. > See it more positive, noone is against your idea!
> So maybe it's a good idea to first have a quick vote about > whether to mark internal classes as such or to mark > "published classes/interfaces" > as such (and then decide how to mark them). > +1 for marking internal classes; everything that's not marked is public. Carsten
