Then please don't tell me that Woody can be used without Flowscript in the future. If it doesn't provide all the parts necessary for it to be used from the sitemap without writing Java code it simply doesn't provide the support.
Ralph -----Original Message----- From: Bruno Dumon To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2/15/2004 12:36 AM Subject: RE: [VOTE] Woody scratchpad area On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 16:50, Ralph Goers wrote: > Yes - that would be the point. While I'm certainly quite capable of writing > Java code, I don't think it is sufficient to say that Woody Bindings don't > require flowscript without the required actions being provided. I can't follow the logic in that. Anyway, you could be waiting for a very long time, if not forever, for those actions to appear. I.o.w. if you want them, you'll have to create them (and since it's only a few lines of code, it's no big deal). I'm not even sure we would accept them as patches... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruno Dumon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 12:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Woody scratchpad area > > > The major stumbling block was in the areas of > > Woody Bindings - the only provided solution seems to require flowscript. > > I'm amazed how you can say that when I've just answered a question to > you (on the users list) about that a couple of hours ago. If my answer > didn't satisfy you, just say so. > > Now I'm starting to realize that maybe you're not asking for Java code > samples, but for pre-made actions that you can call with some > parameters? -- Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
