DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24402>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24402 [PATCH] XML posting from SourceWritingTransformer by using an enhanced HTTPClientSource ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-14 14:51 ------- I agree about the source:source-parameter part of your proposal, it seem like a good idea to introduce that for all of the elements: write/insert/delete/post. And also to make it more general so that we have: <source:source-parameter name="method">POST</source:source-parameter> <source:source-parameter name="header-xyz">VALUE</...> as you sugested and maybe: <source:source-parameter name="query-param-xyz">VALUE</...> as well for being able to add query parameters to the URI as well. For combining source:post and source:write I am not that certain. The semantics of the source:post is that is first gets the output stream from the modifyable source and writes it XML fragment to it and after that it gets the input stream and add the content of that to the output from the transformer. The source:write just writes to the modifiable source and never asks for its input stream. It is not certain that you want to output the content of e.g. a file that you wrote to. I am not certain that all modifiable sources realy are designed for reading from. So I think it is quite natural to differ between the write and post operation, but maybe we shoud find another name than post as it is coupled to the HTTP-protocol, but I didn't found any better names. Any ideas? WDYT?
