Hi , Ed This setting just make explain test happy. You can try it.
Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> 于2024年11月21日周四 15:22写道： > Thank you for sharing this. I am familiar with the previous Cloudberry > workflow file and the use of it for "icw-orca-test". > > Again, I thought the default optimizer setting is "on". In this case, is > there a need to even set it? > > Notice after creating the demo cluster, the optimizer is set to "on". > > https://github.com/edespino/cloudberry/actions/runs/11944371481/job/33295504090#step:14:247 > > -=e > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:15 PM 杨江华 <yjhj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, Ed > > refer to cloudberry : > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/blob/1.5.4/.github/workflows/build.yml > > ```c++ > > icw-orca-test: > > needs: build > > runs-on: [self-hosted, example] > > env: > > MAKE_TEST_COMMAND: "-k PGOPTIONS='-c optimizer=on' > > installcheck-world" > > TEST_OS: "centos" > > DUMP_DB: "true" > > ``` > > Here explicitly set PGOPTIONS='-c optimizer=on'. > > > > > > Ed Espino <eesp...@gmail.com> 于2024年11月21日周四 15:00写道： > > > > > Please: you can call me Ed (艾德) > > > > > > I thought Orca (optimizer) was enabled by default. Is that not the case > > > with Cloudberry? > > > > > > -=e > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 10:51 PM 杨江华 <yjhj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Espino, > > > > > > > > I found that ic-good-opt-on pipeline failed to explain. You can set > > > > PGOPTIONS='-c > > > > optimizer=on' explicitly. Hope to solve this. > > > > > > > > Thank you for your time and support. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> 于2024年11月21日周四 12:40写道： > > > > > > > > > I've identified a solution for running our previously disabled test > > > > suites > > > > > ( > > > > > cbdb_parallel and instr_in_shmem_verify) in the GitHub Actions CI > > > > > environment. By increasing the container shared memory using the > > > > > --shm-size=2gb parameter, these test suites are now passing > > > consistently. > > > > > > > > > > I'm currently conducting additional testing to verify the stability > > of > > > > this > > > > > solution. You can review the test results here: > > > > > > > > > > - > https://github.com/edespino/cloudberry/actions/runs/11944371481 > > > > > - > https://github.com/edespino/cloudberry/actions/runs/11943779438 > > > > > - > https://github.com/edespino/cloudberry/actions/runs/11943000112 > > > > > > > > > > However, I've noticed some inconsistencies in other test suites > > during > > > > this > > > > > investigation. I would appreciate if you all could review these > > results > > > > and > > > > > provide feedback on the increased shared memory solution and any > > > insights > > > > > into the inconsistent test results observed in other suites. > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > -=e > > > > > -- > > > > > Ed Espino > > > > > Apache Cloudberry (incubating) & MADlib > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Ed Espino > > > > > > > > -- > Ed Espino > Apache Cloudberry (incubating) & MADlib >
