Thank you for sharing this. I am familiar with the previous Cloudberry
workflow file and the use of it for "icw-orca-test".

Again, I thought the default optimizer setting is "on". In this case, is
there a need to even set it?

Notice after creating the demo cluster, the optimizer is set to "on".
https://github.com/edespino/cloudberry/actions/runs/11944371481/job/33295504090#step:14:247

-=e

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:15 PM 杨江华 <yjhj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, Ed
> refer to cloudberry :
> https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/blob/1.5.4/.github/workflows/build.yml
> ```c++
> icw-orca-test:
>     needs: build
>     runs-on: [self-hosted, example]
>     env:
>       MAKE_TEST_COMMAND: "-k PGOPTIONS='-c optimizer=on'
> installcheck-world"
>       TEST_OS: "centos"
>       DUMP_DB: "true"
> ```
> Here explicitly set PGOPTIONS='-c optimizer=on'.
>
>
> Ed Espino <eesp...@gmail.com> 于2024年11月21日周四 15:00写道:
>
> > Please: you can call me Ed (艾德)
> >
> > I thought Orca (optimizer) was enabled by default. Is that not the case
> > with Cloudberry?
> >
> > -=e
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 10:51 PM 杨江华 <yjhj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Espino,
> > >
> > > I found that ic-good-opt-on pipeline failed to explain. You can set
> > > PGOPTIONS='-c
> > > optimizer=on' explicitly. Hope to solve this.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your time and support.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> 于2024年11月21日周四 12:40写道:
> > >
> > > > I've identified a solution for running our previously disabled test
> > > suites
> > > > (
> > > > cbdb_parallel and instr_in_shmem_verify) in the GitHub Actions CI
> > > > environment. By increasing the container shared memory using the
> > > > --shm-size=2gb parameter, these test suites are now passing
> > consistently.
> > > >
> > > > I'm currently conducting additional testing to verify the stability
> of
> > > this
> > > > solution. You can review the test results here:
> > > >
> > > >    - https://github.com/edespino/cloudberry/actions/runs/11944371481
> > > >    - https://github.com/edespino/cloudberry/actions/runs/11943779438
> > > >    - https://github.com/edespino/cloudberry/actions/runs/11943000112
> > > >
> > > > However, I've noticed some inconsistencies in other test suites
> during
> > > this
> > > > investigation. I would appreciate if you all could review these
> results
> > > and
> > > > provide feedback on the increased shared memory solution and any
> > insights
> > > > into the inconsistent test results observed in other suites.
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > -=e
> > > > --
> > > > Ed Espino
> > > > Apache Cloudberry (incubating) & MADlib
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ed Espino
> >
>


-- 
Ed Espino
Apache Cloudberry (incubating) & MADlib

Reply via email to