Re: [DISCUSS] Bringing jamm in-tree

[Mick]

> I am not sure modules vs in-tree. Probably someone has to play a bit with it 
> to provide the pros and cons here? (If it was not already done)


It's what we are doing with accord.  It allows cassandra-accord to live as a 
separate codebase and library so others are free and can more easily use and 
contribute to it, but allows us to use it as one codebase part of in-tree and 
not have to go through the rigamarole of releases.

I'm not aware of any reasons why we wouldn't take this approach (now that we 
have accepted the use of git submodules in the project) …?