Another datapoint: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.github.jbellis/jamm
Usages for the latest version: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.github.jbellis/jamm/0.4.0/usages On Wed, 10 Dec 2025 at 17:39, Josh McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote: > jamm seems to have a decent user base > > I'm looking but I don't see it; curious what makes you say this. The > project hasn't had any commits since looks like 10/2023, new forks aren't > being made, new issues and PR's not being opened. > > I definitely want us to maintain the ability to cut an isolated build, > test, release cycle of jamm so anyone that *is *using it and had any > interest in contributing should be able to do so with the same ease they > have today. The added friction would be the small hurdle of needing to > clone the C* repo instead of just jamm. > >
