> > If I were to vote on this, it would be -1 (non-binding) due to > non-compliance with ASF policy on releases. > > I checked: > - signatures and hashes are correct > - It looks like there might be compiled code in the release? [1][2] > - LICENSE is misisng some 3rd party code license information [5] This > contains code "Copyright DataStax, Inc." under ALv2, python-smhasher under > MIT, OrderedDict under MIT (copyright Raymond Hettinger) and code from > MagnetoDB under ALv2. > - LICENSE has no mention of 3rd party CRC code in [10] > - Note that any code under CC 4.0 is incompatible with the ALv2. [11] > - LICENSE also doesn't mention this file [9] > - In LICENSE LongTimSort.java incorrectly mentions two different copyright > owners > - In LICENSE, AbstractGuavaIterator.java is incorrectly mentioned as > AbstractIterator.java > - NOTICE seems OK but may also be missing some things due to misisng 3rd > party code in LICENSE under ALv2 > - Files are misisng ASF headers [3][4][6][7][8] are these 3rd party files? > - I didn't try compiling from the source >
I'll formalise that -1 There's a few things here for us to fix, thanks for spending the time to find them.
