We can for completeness, but even with twice as much usage reported as the other methods, I don't think it will affect the outcome of the vote.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022, 7:25 AM Paulo Motta <pauloricard...@gmail.com> wrote: > This proposal looks good to me, +1. I was wondering if we should not run > this proposal on the user@ list to check if there's any additional > feedback in addition to the informal Twitter and Linkedin channels? > > Em qua., 19 de jan. de 2022 às 10:18, Sylwester Lachiewicz < > slachiew...@gmail.com> escreveu: > >> +1 (Nb) >> >> śr., 19 sty 2022, 12:31 użytkownik Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> >> napisał: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:30 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova >>> <e.dimitr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi everyone, >>> > >>> > With the work to add Java 17 support for Cassandra, a new question >>> around the future of UDF was raised. The scripted UDF was using Nashorn >>> which is no longer packaged with the JDK. There are options to add new >>> dependencies to Graal JS for example but it seems people are not sure that >>> it is worth it. Please check the discussion on CASSANDRA-16895. >>> > >>> > The following suggestion was made by Marcus and supported by other PMC >>> members - "I think we should deprecate scripted UDFs now and drop them from >>> the next major, but possibly provide hooks for people to write their own >>> UDF "engines" and break out the current javascript implementation in to its >>> own repository (but not ship it with Cassandra)." >>> > >>> > As a result we decided to engage with our users and created a Twitter >>> survey. Results below: >>> > >>> > We would love to understand how you use ApacheCassandra UDFs and UDAs. >>> > >>> > 32 people responded as follows: >>> > >>> > We do not use them - 75% >>> > We only use Java UDFs - 22% >>> > We only use JS UDFs - 0% >>> > We use Java and JS UDFs - 3% >>> > >>> > We also received feedback on LinkedIN on the topic - >>> https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6886728406742970369?commentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28activity%3A6886728406742970369%2C6886793921020608512%29&replyUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28activity%3A6886728406742970369%2C6887421509485248512%29 >>> > >>> > >>> > Thoughts? >>> > >>> > Best regards, >>> > Ekaterina >>> >>
