This proposal looks good to me, +1. I was wondering if we should not run this proposal on the user@ list to check if there's any additional feedback in addition to the informal Twitter and Linkedin channels?
Em qua., 19 de jan. de 2022 às 10:18, Sylwester Lachiewicz < slachiew...@gmail.com> escreveu: > +1 (Nb) > > śr., 19 sty 2022, 12:31 użytkownik Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> > napisał: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:30 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova >> <e.dimitr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > With the work to add Java 17 support for Cassandra, a new question >> around the future of UDF was raised. The scripted UDF was using Nashorn >> which is no longer packaged with the JDK. There are options to add new >> dependencies to Graal JS for example but it seems people are not sure that >> it is worth it. Please check the discussion on CASSANDRA-16895. >> > >> > The following suggestion was made by Marcus and supported by other PMC >> members - "I think we should deprecate scripted UDFs now and drop them from >> the next major, but possibly provide hooks for people to write their own >> UDF "engines" and break out the current javascript implementation in to its >> own repository (but not ship it with Cassandra)." >> > >> > As a result we decided to engage with our users and created a Twitter >> survey. Results below: >> > >> > We would love to understand how you use ApacheCassandra UDFs and UDAs. >> > >> > 32 people responded as follows: >> > >> > We do not use them - 75% >> > We only use Java UDFs - 22% >> > We only use JS UDFs - 0% >> > We use Java and JS UDFs - 3% >> > >> > We also received feedback on LinkedIN on the topic - >> https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6886728406742970369?commentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28activity%3A6886728406742970369%2C6886793921020608512%29&replyUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28activity%3A6886728406742970369%2C6887421509485248512%29 >> > >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Ekaterina >> >
