I'm a huge +1 to the sentiments here. I have to confess that I've been responsible for publishing the updates for several months now with Mick's mentoring. I publish the content I was requested to push to the site but as far as review is concerned, the only review I do is mostly around grammar and formatting and make sure that the updates render correctly on the site.
It would be ideal if there was a charter from the community I could refer to so it wouldn't seem like I'm unilaterally rejecting some entries but not others. I'm glad we've got this thread because I could use it to support what I do on the site. Cheers!
