+1 > On 23 Jun 2021, at 22:31, Jeff Jirsa <[email protected]> wrote: > > This would be my preference. > > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 2:22 PM Ben Bromhead <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm also comfortable with a strict approach where we just list actual >> Apache Cassandra offerings, that also provides good solid clarity to users. >> >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 3:06 AM [email protected] <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> From: Brandon Williams <[email protected]> >>> Date: Wednesday, 23 June 2021 at 15:44 >>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: Additions to Cassandra ecosystem page? >>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 9:38 AM Joshua McKenzie <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The obvious core responsibility of the website should be to ASLv2 >>>> permissively licensed Apache Cassandra and secondarily to CQL as a >>> protocol >>>> IMO. I don't think we as a project should be tracking derivative works, >>>> forks, or other things built on top of the code-base and certainly not >>>> things with wildly varied licensing (AGPL, proprietary closed, etc). >>> >>> I agree. I don't see how it makes sense for us to promote less >>> compatible derivatives with more restrictive licensing. Imitation may >>> be flattery but as you pointed out, we don't need to be the ones >>> advertising it. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Ben Bromhead >> >> Instaclustr | www.instaclustr.com | @instaclustr >> <http://twitter.com/instaclustr> | +64 27 383 8975 >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
