sorry, Hadrian, just read your message on [DISCUSS] I'll not confuse things with a "+0"
+1 brooklyn-cli On 26 November 2015 at 17:13, Robert Moss <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 new repo > +0 named brooklyn-client > > On 26 November 2015 at 10:32, Guglielmo Nigri < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 separate repo for the go language CLI >> >> >> >> >> On 26 November 2015 at 01:56, Mike Zaccardo < >> [email protected] >> > wrote: >> >> > +1 brooklyn-client in a sep. repo >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:01 PM Geoff Macartney < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > + 1 on separate repo >> > > +1 for brooklyn-client >> > > >> > > >> > > ———————————————————— >> > > Gnu PGP key - http://is.gd/TTTTuI >> > > >> > > >> > > > On 25 Nov 2015, at 20:57, David Lloyd < >> [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > +1 for the change to brooklyn-client >> > > > >> > > > On 25 November 2015 at 17:55, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> There are two parts for this vote, one the creation of a *separate* >> > > repo, >> > > >> second the *name* of the repo. The name of the repo matters less >> than >> > > the >> > > >> name of the delivered artifact and I agree that brooklyn-client is >> > > slightly >> > > >> more expressive than cli. >> > > >> >> > > >> +1 on the change. Agree we don't need another vote, unless the >> change >> > > will >> > > >> create contention, which is not likely imho, given the nature of >> the >> > > >> amendment. >> > > >> >> > > >> Cheers, >> > > >> Hadrian >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> On 11/25/2015 12:37 PM, Alex Heneveld wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Changing vote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>> +1 brooklyn-client >> > > >>> >> > > >>> If you've voted and you like this please consider changing! >> > > >>> >> > > >>> I know there are other types of clients (jsgui, stubs) but there >> are >> > > >>> other CLI's also (e.g. server-cli). brooklyn-client-cli would be >> > > >>> possible, but I think the CLI is what we want to emphasise, and in >> > the >> > > >>> interest of simplicity the following feels pretty good and has a >> nice >> > > >>> symmetry: >> > > >>> >> > > >>> * brooklyn-server >> > > >>> * brooklyn-client >> > > >>> * brooklyn-ui >> > > >>> >> > > >>> (Detailed updated discuss and vote for repos to follow.) >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Best >> > > >>> Alex >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> On 24/11/2015 15:00, Andrea Turli wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>>> +1 brooklyn-cli >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 15:59 David Lloyd < >> > > [email protected]> >> > > >>>> wrote: >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> +1 brooklyn-cli >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> On 24 November 2015 at 14:05, Mark McKenna >> > > >>>>> <[email protected] >> > > >>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> +1: brooklyn-cli >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 14:04 Aled Sage <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> +1: brooklyn-cli >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> On 24/11/2015 13:59, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Brooklyners, >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Given the feedback on the [HEADS-UP] thread to David and >> Geoff's >> > > >>>>>>>> proposal, I move to starting a vote for the creation of a >> > separate >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> git >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>>> repo: brooklyn-cli. Tthe vote is both for the creation of the >> > repo, >> > > >>>>>>>> and its name. The name with the largest number of vote wins, >> > > unless >> > > >>>>>>>> strong objections will send us back to the drawing board. >> This >> > > vote >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> is >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>>> *not* for the name of the executable (br or bk). >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-cli (create repo with this name: a heneveld >> > > proposal) >> > > >>>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-commons-cli (create repo with this name: >> mzaccardo >> > > >>>>>>>> proposal) >> > > >>>>>>>> [-1] we do not need a separate repo >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Please cast your vote. The vote is open for 72+ hours. >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Cheers, >> > > >>>>>>>> Hadrian >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> -- >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> *Mark McKenna* >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> *Twitter :: @m4rkmckenna <https://twitter.com/m4rkmckenna>* >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> *PGP :: public-key >> > > >>>>>> < >> https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B5DC759B1EB76A7 >> > >* >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >
