+1 new repo +0 named brooklyn-client On 26 November 2015 at 10:32, Guglielmo Nigri < [email protected]> wrote:
> +1 separate repo for the go language CLI > > > > > On 26 November 2015 at 01:56, Mike Zaccardo < > [email protected] > > wrote: > > > +1 brooklyn-client in a sep. repo > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:01 PM Geoff Macartney < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > + 1 on separate repo > > > +1 for brooklyn-client > > > > > > > > > ———————————————————— > > > Gnu PGP key - http://is.gd/TTTTuI > > > > > > > > > > On 25 Nov 2015, at 20:57, David Lloyd <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 for the change to brooklyn-client > > > > > > > > On 25 November 2015 at 17:55, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> There are two parts for this vote, one the creation of a *separate* > > > repo, > > > >> second the *name* of the repo. The name of the repo matters less > than > > > the > > > >> name of the delivered artifact and I agree that brooklyn-client is > > > slightly > > > >> more expressive than cli. > > > >> > > > >> +1 on the change. Agree we don't need another vote, unless the > change > > > will > > > >> create contention, which is not likely imho, given the nature of the > > > >> amendment. > > > >> > > > >> Cheers, > > > >> Hadrian > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On 11/25/2015 12:37 PM, Alex Heneveld wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>> Changing vote: > > > >>> > > > >>> +1 brooklyn-client > > > >>> > > > >>> If you've voted and you like this please consider changing! > > > >>> > > > >>> I know there are other types of clients (jsgui, stubs) but there > are > > > >>> other CLI's also (e.g. server-cli). brooklyn-client-cli would be > > > >>> possible, but I think the CLI is what we want to emphasise, and in > > the > > > >>> interest of simplicity the following feels pretty good and has a > nice > > > >>> symmetry: > > > >>> > > > >>> * brooklyn-server > > > >>> * brooklyn-client > > > >>> * brooklyn-ui > > > >>> > > > >>> (Detailed updated discuss and vote for repos to follow.) > > > >>> > > > >>> Best > > > >>> Alex > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On 24/11/2015 15:00, Andrea Turli wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> +1 brooklyn-cli > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 15:59 David Lloyd < > > > [email protected]> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> +1 brooklyn-cli > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On 24 November 2015 at 14:05, Mark McKenna > > > >>>>> <[email protected] > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> +1: brooklyn-cli > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 at 14:04 Aled Sage <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> +1: brooklyn-cli > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On 24/11/2015 13:59, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Brooklyners, > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Given the feedback on the [HEADS-UP] thread to David and > Geoff's > > > >>>>>>>> proposal, I move to starting a vote for the creation of a > > separate > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> git > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> repo: brooklyn-cli. Tthe vote is both for the creation of the > > repo, > > > >>>>>>>> and its name. The name with the largest number of vote wins, > > > unless > > > >>>>>>>> strong objections will send us back to the drawing board. This > > > vote > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> is > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> *not* for the name of the executable (br or bk). > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-cli (create repo with this name: a heneveld > > > proposal) > > > >>>>>>>> [+1] brooklyn-commons-cli (create repo with this name: > mzaccardo > > > >>>>>>>> proposal) > > > >>>>>>>> [-1] we do not need a separate repo > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Please cast your vote. The vote is open for 72+ hours. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>> Hadrian > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> *Mark McKenna* > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> *Twitter :: @m4rkmckenna <https://twitter.com/m4rkmckenna>* > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> *PGP :: public-key > > > >>>>>> < > https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B5DC759B1EB76A7 > > >* > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >
