[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15979679#comment-15979679
]
Suma Shivaprasad commented on ATLAS-1690:
-----------------------------------------
4. Also adding a relationship type/category would help in identifying different
kinds of relationship? For eg: composition/aggregation/inheritance/association
etc instead of indirectly deriving it from the flags like isContainer etc?
There might be other categories which map not map one on one to UML like
is_a_type_of which you had mentioned in the Glossary Design doc. this would
also help in easily discovering relationships among model types which is not
possible currently.
> Introduce top level relationships
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: ATLAS-1690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1690
> Project: Atlas
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: David Radley
> Assignee: David Radley
> Labels: VirtualDataConnector
> Attachments: Atlas Relationships proposal v1.0.pdf, Atlas
> Relationships proposal v1.1.pdf, Atlas Relationships proposal v1.2.pdf, Atlas
> Relationships proposal v1.3.pdf, Atlas Relationships proposal v1.4.pdf
>
>
> Introduce top level relationships including support for
> -many to many relationships
> - relationship names including the name for both ends and the relationship.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
