I can't say I fullu understand what you want to do.
Would you use TLS client-cert-auth to the proxy and then let the
application based on received cert do a popCR?
Are we talking javascript or native code?

Anders

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Emmanuel Dreyfus" <m...@netbsd.org>
To: "mozilla's crypto code discussion list" <dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 14:12
Subject: Re: popChallengeResponse unimplemented?


Anders Rundgren <anders.rundg...@telia.com> wrote:

> That's correct.  But even if you send a stolen static cert req, you don't
> get very far with that since if you haven't the private key you can't
> use the returned cert anyway which I guess is why this function haven't been
> much requested.
> 
> I'm not sure what you had intended to use this function 

My idea was to use it for authentications purpose. The SSL handshake
only allows the client to authenticate against the web server. If you
want to authenticate using certificate to another service for which the
web server is just a proxy (a LDAP directory for which you have a web
frontend is an example), you must have a privilegied web application.

In order to make the web application unprivilegied, I had the idea of
implementing a SASL plugin that would send a POP challenge to the
browser. But perhaps there are alternatives?

--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
-- 
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
-- 
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to