Kyle Hamilton wrote: > Putting a non-legal name in the CN is absolutely NOT a correct > implementation. That rightfully belongs in the "Organization" field, > not the common name.
Do you have any standard document proving that statement? Up to now I thought that commonName (coming from the X.500 world) is a naming attribute with pretty broad semantics. Ciao, Michael. -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
