Anders Rundgren wrote, On 2009-03-22 14:20: > Nelson B Bolyard wrote: > >>>> Solution: One solution would be to define signature support as a >>>> browser component. > >> Especially the component you've invented and have been trying to get >> Mozilla to adopt for some time, right? Anders? > > At this stage it is enough considering (acknowledging) the 10M+ that > already use signature plugins. > >> Let's see a standard from W3C (or browser standards group de jour) >> first. > > I believe we will have to wait a long time for that one. There is an > intermediate MUCH more interesting thing for Mozilla and other vendors to > do and that is defining a useful way of adding XML protocol browser > extensions. There is a ton of efforts that simply goes nowhere including > IETF's KEYPROV because it is such a problem to get this basic thing.
Have you developed a Firefox browser extension? -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
