Nelson B Bolyard wrote: >>> Solution: One solution would be to define signature support as a >>> browser component.
>Especially the component you've invented and have been trying to get >Mozilla to adopt for some time, right? Anders? At this stage it is enough considering (acknowledging) the 10M+ that already use signature plugins. >Let's see a standard from W3C (or browser standards group de jour) first. I believe we will have to wait a long time for that one. There is an intermediate MUCH more interesting thing for Mozilla and other vendors to do and that is defining a useful way of adding XML protocol browser extensions. There is a ton of efforts that simply goes nowhere including IETF's KEYPROV because it is such a problem to get this basic thing. Anders -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
