In chronological order, Julien wrote: >>>> If you follow the KCM logic, you would have to give an application >>>> warning, which is completely unwarranted under current standards.
>> Ian G replied: >>> If the new cert is unauthentic, then it would cause some form of alert >>> that would be entirely warranted. Currently, a false cert will slip >>> through without any change. > On 9/1/09 21:05, Julien R Pierre wrote: >> For what definition of false ? Ian G wrote, On 2009-01-10 10:14: > Indeed a good question. Who do we ask? Ian, You chose the word "false" in your reply, quoted above. I believe Julien was asking YOU to clarify what YOU meant by that word. _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
