On Jan 12, 10:45 am, Eddy Nigg <eddy_n...@startcom.org> wrote: > On 01/12/2009 11:27 AM, wolfgang.piet...@t-systems.com: > > > > > Frank, > > > The Comodo topic has once again sparked a fierce discussion about the > > validity of certificates, how appropriate levels of security and trust > > should look like and what to do to establish them. > > > Since we expect this discussion to have "some" impact on the > > evaluation of requests for Root integration (the current schedule > > appears not to be valid anymore) we wonder whether you can tell us > > something about your plans to work on that topic and what does that > > mean for all pending requests for integration?! > > Wolfgang, does your CA rely on RAs? It was my understanding IIRC that it > is not the case. If the issues raised previously were addressed by you > and the bug updated accordingly, than I don't think there should be any > delay in continuing the schedule including the inclusion request of your CA.
Eddy, no we don't rely on external RAs (for services under the root we made our request for). Still we see that this discussion potentially will result in some work to change policies. If this is so, will requests be processed anyway during that time? > > Frank, is there any reason why no inclusions (and relevant comments > periods) aren't processed according to schedule? Is there any resolution > pending which prevents us from doing so? > > -- > Regards > > Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. > Jabber: start...@startcom.org > Blog: https://blog.startcom.org Regards Wolfgang Pietrus _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
