On 11/12/2008 05:21 PM, Ian G:
No it's not. You just need the person, not their identity.
LOL, you are funny...and how exactly do you get the person if you don't
know who it is that you need? This is what the (verified real) identity
details in certificates are here for...
If you need to get someone in court, they either come willingly, in
which case nothing is needed, or you need to find the person.
You still need to know who it is that you want to get to court...
courts will these days accept an email
address if the circumstances are appropriate (e.g., that's how he
closest you got when doing business).
Most likely not. I can be [EMAIL PROTECTED] any time I want.
Because if you claim that it is needed to resolve disputes, then this
may be deceptive. (At the least, you should figure out why it is needed
and use that reason.)
What's new here?
According to my preference I may freely decide in order to give
somebody access to certain resources which are truly under my control,
I may require a verified identity too. It's about the risk assessment
of each of us, being it private or corporate.
OK, I buy that. Would you sign to that as a principle?
I think so, yes. It's applied already today in some forms. It can be
done better...
--
Regards
Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd.
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: https://blog.startcom.org
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
