Kyle Hamilton wrote: > 2008/8/20 Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Luckily, Michael also stated that most CA's rejected his requests. But it >> only takes one CA to spoil the party.
> Of course, if he doesn't provide the certificate and proof that he has > the private key to it, I'm going to believe this as an unfounded > attack against the credibility of the PKI system in general. > > It's called "put up or shut up". Unfortunately, since there's no > single "owner" of the PKI, there's no place/person who can directly > claim slander or libel and thus damages, which essentially makes these > types of attacks damaging without recourse. I agree with you completely on the above quoted points. Someone from Mozilla is trying to get info about the CA from the presenter. _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
