2008/8/20 Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Luckily, Michael also stated that most CA's rejected his requests. But it > only takes one CA to spoil the party. >
It only takes one CA to spoil the party, because there's no presentation to the user of who's responsible for the muckup. Of course, if he doesn't provide the certificate and proof that he has the private key to it, I'm going to believe this as an unfounded attack against the credibility of the PKI system in general. It's called "put up or shut up". Unfortunately, since there's no single "owner" of the PKI, there's no place/person who can directly claim slander or libel and thus damages, which essentially makes these types of attacks damaging without recourse. -Kyle H _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
