Paul, Paul Hoffman wrote: > At 11:43 PM +0200 7/23/08, Daniel Stenberg wrote: >> If you can stand a comparison that also involves GnuTLS, then the >> GnuTLS guys >> have one: >> >> http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/comparison.html > > There are a lot of question marks on that for NSS. Someone familiar with > all the NSS extensions should send them some updates.
Here are some updates for NSS : Protocol support : TLS 1.1 : partial (SNI client side only) TLS 1.2 : No Encryption algs : RC4-40 and RC2-40 are supported Compression : ZLIB/LZO : No Extensions : No accross the board Copyright owner : RSA security should be removed ! Netscape/Sun/Red Hats are the original developers of most of the code. But they don't hold the copyright (see GPL/LPGL/MPL licenses) Note that as Wan-Teh pointed out, the code size listing is incorrect. Some libraries are missing, such as libfreebl3 and libnssutil3 . libsmime3 is also missing, though not strictly required for SSL/TLS operation. But it is part of NSS. _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
