Thorsten Becker: > Eddy Nigg schrieb: > >> I think one CA in public discussion per time just fine, however the >> overall throughput could be accelerated. That would allow for a new CA >> every two weeks or so. > > that's an excellent idea to schedule the start of a public discussion > phase every two weeks. Additionally it would be great to have a "public > queue", where every request that has passed the information gathering > process would be placed. So every CA would know exactly when public > discussion will start. It would make the whole process more transparent. >
Well, the information gathering is only one of the steps (the first actually) which has to be performed by the NSS team. The information has to be evaluated carefully and most of the times requires additional inquires. Frank has to make a decision of to submit the CA in question to the public discussion. Needless to say that there isn't much point in submitting a CA for discussion if there are uncleared issues are flaws in their procedures. But of course, the process could be and perhaps should be structured in the most efficient way. Cheers! -- Regards Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: https://blog.startcom.org _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
