pascal wrote, On 2008-05-22 15:45: > Nelson B Bolyard a écrit : > >>> and in the bug, they provided the information we were asking >> They did? That information was supplied in comment 8 by a third >> party, namely you. Are you an official representative of FNMT? >> If not, then I suggest that you step back, and make it clear to >> FNMT that they must communicate with Mozilla directly in the bug. >> Again, that is not a new requirement. Mozilla has enforced that >> policy for years. > > I am a Mozilla Corp. employee and a Mozilla Europe board member, Gerv > that they contacted by email is a Mozilla Foundation employee and has > been visible as the mozilla CA guy in Europe for a long time.
Sounds like a lot of information has failed to cross the Atlantic in both directions. Since you don't post from a mozilla.org email address, I had no idea that you work for Mozilla. Gerv has not been responsible for the root CA program for at least 6 months. He was on leave for quite some time, if I'm not mistaken. > Are you telling me that Cristina not creating the attachment herself but > asking for help to European mozilla employees is not communicating with > Mozilla? It's pretty apparent that NONE of the people who have been responding to you in this thread had any idea that you were affiliated with Mozilla. I think this may be the first thread in which you've ever posted in this list/newsgroup. Maybe you should introduce yourself. You may be well known in certain circles, but in this newsgroup, you're unknown. Personally, I will look for confirmation from Frank before proceeding. > Should I draw the conclusion from your comments that you are now the new > person in charge of certificates for Mozilla Foundation replacing Gerv? As NSS module co-owner, I share in the responsibility for ensuring that the certs put into NSS have followed Mozilla's policy. > Pascal _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
