Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) a écrit : > Nukeador: >> Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) escribió: >>> >>> Please make FNMT or the individual CAs aware of this fact and ask >>> them to make a request for inclusion according to the guidelines from >>> here: http://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Root_Certificate_Requests >>> >>> There is nothing else you can do at this stage. >>> >> They have already done it in bug 408008 >> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408008), Cristina is >> from FNMT and, as you can see, she sent all the information to the bug >> via Pascal. >> > OK, I understand. This request is fairly new, but I also can't see > anywhere at this bug that the representative of this CA submitted and > completed all information required to start any evaluation according to > http://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Root_Certificate_Requests
This page was created in March, they provided all the data in February based on the scarse documentation we could point them too. You can't blame them for not following guidelines that didn't exist, especially if you haven't informed them personally of a process change after they provided the requested information. > > This bug can't be considered to be a request for inclusion. I suggest > that the representative opens a new bug and provides all needed > information according to the *template* from the above link. Once an > inclusion requests has been submitted correctly the request will be > considered and processed accordingly. (Please also note that currently > there is a backlog of processing CA inclusion requests.) > FNMT has emailed gerv asking if they should open a separate bug or not asking if we needed more information and if they were following the right process. They didn't get any response that's why I attached the files they had sent to the bug. I understand that there is a long backlog, that everybody is busy and that other CA are much more active on bugzilla than FNMT , but saying that they did it incorrectly while we had no clear process to follow and ignored their email is not correct, we definitely have our own wrongs on this issue (and probably other CAs). Fact is that a bug is open, that FNMT has contacted Mozilla Foundation directly both by email and in the bug, they provided the information we were asking and are waiting for us to get back to them with a yes or no answer. Pascal _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
