I have a few more comments/annotations:

(1) Pro EV persons argue "Criminals have problems getting an EV certificate, so 
most of them are using only DV certificates".

Anti EV persons argue "Criminals just don't use EV certificates, because they 
know that end users don't look at the EV indicator anyway".

I assume, we do not know which of these two assumptions fits to the majority of 
criminals. So why should we make a decision (change of UI) based on such 
assumptions?

(2) I am a pro EV person, and I do not have any financial benefit from EV 
certificates. I do not own EV certificates, instead my own websites use Let's 
Encrypt DV certificates. But when I visit important pages like Google or 
PayPal, I do look at the EV indicator bar, because I know that these pages 
always have an EV certificate. If I would visit PayPal and only see a normal 
pad lock (DV), then I would instantly leave the page because I know that PayPal 
always has an EV certificate. So, at least for me, the UI change is very 
negative (except if you color the pad lock in a different color, that would be 
OK for me). We cannot say that all users don't care about the EV indicator. For 
some users like me, it is important.

(3) Also, I wanted to ask, if you want to remove the UI indicator, because you 
think that EV certificates give the feeling of false security, then please tell 
me: What is the alternative? Removing the UI bling without giving any 
alternative solution is just wrong in my opinion. Yes, there might be a tiny 
amount of phishing sites that use EV certificates, but the EV indicator bar is 
still better than just nothing. AntiPhishing filters are not a good alternative 
because they only protect when the harm is already done to some users.
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to