On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, at 11:58 AM, Jeff Gilbert wrote: > Do we have a heuristic for when to /not/ include something from HTML in SVG?
If it doesn't make two features which already exist in both HTML and SVG more consistent, then I wouldn't include it. > More or less, these additions to SVG just strike me as having solid > potential risk (for both spec-interaction and implementation bugs) and > negligible upside. Do we have people asking for this? I don't know of people asking for this, but I would hope that we could share the implementations of these properties between HTMLAnchorElement and SVGAElement. The closer the two <a> elements are in behavior, and the more we can share implementation between them, the lower the risk for bugs between the two. (Ignoring the general risk of bugs from touching code at all.) > Are there privacy concerns from embedding pings (et al) in images? I > suppose we better have been handling CORS requests from within SVGs > properly already, so it should Just Work? SVG as images don't have scripting and can't be interacted with to activate links, so I don't think it's a concern there. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
