On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Andrew McCreight <amccrei...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I've been using git for years now to develop Firefox, and I feel like it is > a first class experience. There's a one time cost to setting up cinnabar, > but after that, everything just works, including |mach try| and |mach > mozreview|. It is still probably less setup than Mercurial users have to go > through to install enough extensions to make hg usable. ;) Sure, there's a > bit of "wacky custom machinery", but developers using hg also have to deal > with some of that, so that's more of a Firefox developer problem than a git > Firefox developer problem. The experience with git-cinnabar has been pretty smooth for me, too. If we could make the tool update process match the mercurial experience (mach mercurial-setup -u), it would be great. I was planning to work on this, but the long-term plans seemed unclear at the time: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1257478 Panos _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
