On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Jean-Yves Avenard <jyaven...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> And yet, despite many people’s concerns, it appears that policy of > removing r+ whenever a new push has been made effective. > To my knowledge, mconnor's proposal has yet to get anywhere close to an actual policy. Was there a behavior change in the MozReview/autoland workflow to do this? That sounds like something we should fix, but in the mean time it seems fine to me to push your patch manually to inbound. > > And so, here I am with a r+ requesting to fix a comment, I have to ask for > r+ again from someone not in my timezone and already on week-end. > > Turn around time, from 30 minutes to 3.5 days…. How is that making our > tree safer? > > JY > > > On 15 Mar 2017, at 4:15 pm, Mike Hoye <mh...@mozilla.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2017-03-14 7:10 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > >> /me just loves when a new set of “rules” are put in place to prevent a > problem that has never existed so far and will be a hindrance to everyone > in the future. > > > > Two dozen or so of our most veteran engineers are deeply involved in > this discussion. Their time and attention are extraordinarily valuable, and > there is no question about their commitment to Mozilla's success. And yet: > here they are, working through the details. > > > > On top of everything else that's been said here, maybe take a moment to > reflect on that. > > > > - mhoye > > _______________________________________________ > > dev-platform mailing list > > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
