> On 12 Mar 2017, at 9:40 pm, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> wrote: > And I still don't understand what the proposal means with rebases in > practice. What if, after automation tries to land your change after you > got your final r+ the final rebase fails and you need to do a manual > rebase? Do you need to get another r+? What happens if you're touching > one of our giant popular headers and someone else manages to land a > conflict while your reviewer gets back to you?
+1, this is a very common scenario for me… /me just loves when a new set of “rules” are put in place to prevent a problem that has never existed so far and will be a hindrance to everyone in the future.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
