On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Mats Palmgren <m...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 02/11/2017 04:59 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > >> The biggest worry for me is that inline style is never a "chrome sheet" >> in this sense. >> > > That's a valid concern, but I think ignoring -moz-appearance has fairly > benign effects in most cases. And as Jet pointed out to me, just landing > it and see what breaks is standard procedure for unprefixing properties: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775235 > > That's not exactly what I said: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1340014#c2 Our procedure for these legacy properties has been to land the unprefixed property, and file separate bugs for removing the prefixed version at a later date. Bug 775235 <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775235> is really a collection of those legacy prefix removals, which tend to never get removed at the later date unless we track them. We have plenty of evidence that the planet requires -webkit-appearance so we should ship that ASAP: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/usage/css/-webkit-appearance/ If we need more time to evaluate the -moz-appearance removal, let's give it the time it needs. The Microsoft Edge team has already done the work to justify landing the unprefixed and -webkit variants. --Jet _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
