On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 3:35:20 AM UTC-7, keithga...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 3:12:31 AM UTC-5, Gervase Markham wrote:
> > On 22/10/16 10:16, keithgallis...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > My concern is that by killing digital certificate updates and TLS
> > > updates, still in use machines whose main purpose is Internet access
> > > are essentially bricked.
> >
> > This is a feature, not a bug. If those machines shouldn't be on the
> > Internet, and things happen which keep them off the Internet, then hooray.
> >
> > Gerv
>
> Like I've said in previous messages on this thread, I agree that XP and Vista
> should be placed on ESR 52, but I'm worried about those people who don't have
> access to tech support at home (friends, family, a tech store, etc.) to help
> them with the next steps of replacing their old machine. It would be good if
> Mozilla had some kind of message at the start of the transfer to ESR 52
> stating that they have X amount of time to upgrade.
>
Feel free to reopen https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1059840 when
ready.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
