Is now the right time to start talking about retiring checkin-needed,
or is it still heavily used?

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 4:58 AM, Gregory Szorc <g...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Felipe G <fel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to make the checkin-needed flag generate a template comment
>> (like the approval-* ones do) with something like this? (Or encourage
>> people to use the per-patch checkin? flag)
>>
>> """
>> Has this patch been through try? [ Yes / No, I believe it's not necessary ]
>> Does this patch contain the correct author / commit message? [ Yes
>> (preferred) / No, but I'm providing it here: ]
>> Are there any other dependencies that should be landed together? [ Yes, ...
>> / No ]
>> """
>>
>> Probably just asking if the information is present will reduce the number
>> of requests made without it
>>
>
> My knee jerk reaction is we shouldn't bother: MozReview handles most of
> this "validation" and usage of MozReview has been steadily increasing.
> We're trending towards a world where the only patches on Splinter are for
> security-sensitive bugs (MozReview can't handle those yet) and the people
> submitting patches to security bugs tend to know what they're doing so I
> don't think these added checks will help.
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Ryan VanderMeulen <rya...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > FWIW, there's also an MDN page that documents a lot of this as well:
>> >
>> >
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mercurial/Using_Mercurial#How_can_I_generate_a_patch_for_somebody_else_to_check-in_for_me.3F
>> >
>> > -Ryan
>> >
>> >
>> > On 7/8/2016 2:32 AM, Carsten Book wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> someone might not know that doing checkins for checkin-needed request is
>> >> not automated yet and completely a fully human task :) (no we Sheriffs
>> are
>> >> not bots ;)
>> >>
>> >> It would help us a lot if a checkin needed request would contain
>> complete
>> >> Author/Patch information like:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>    - Author (use the information from their Bugzilla account if needed)
>> >>    with Name *and *Emailadress.
>> >>    - Bug number
>> >>    - Commit message (keeping in mind that the commit message should be a
>> >>    brief description of what the patch is *doing*)
>> >>       - Format should be something like "Bug 123456 - Add a null check
>> to
>> >>       XYZ to avoid a crash. r=somebody"
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> And also if there is a specific sequence/dependency you want to checkin
>> >> the
>> >> patches it would help also a lot  if you could make a short comment in
>> the
>> >> Bug like please checkin part x then patch y or like first bug 123 then
>> >> this
>> >> bug and then bug 8910.
>> >>
>> >> This would help us a lot :)
>> >>
>> >> Thanks!
>> >>
>> >> - Tomcat
>> >>
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > dev-platform mailing list
>> > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
>> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-platform mailing list
>> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to