Also, perhaps function name (__func__) or one of the pretty versions. -Ekr
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Jeff Gilbert <jgilb...@mozilla.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Gabriele Svelto <gsve...@mozilla.com> > wrote: > > On 31/05/2016 13:26, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote: > >> We could do a find/replace of no-arg calls to a new macro that uses > >> MOZ_CRASH with a boilerplate message, and make the argument non-optional > >> for new uses of MOZ_CRASH? That would avoid the problem for new > >> MOZ_CRASH() additions, which seems like it would be wise so the problem > >> doesn't get worse? Or is it not worth even that? > > > > What about adding file/line number information? This way one could > > always tell where it's coming from even if it doesn't have a descriptive > > string. > > Agreed! These queries are much more useful if they have file names. > Line numbers are a plus, but I agree that since these drift, they are > not useful for collating. File names will generally not drift, and > would make these queries much easier to grep for problems originating > from code we're responsible for. > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform